top of page

Which PAD Screening Tool is More Effective?

Writer's picture: Bo McCorkleBo McCorkle


TM Flow Test vs QuantaFlo

In vascular health diagnostics, the TM Flow System and QuantaFlo Test are prominent tools. While both can diagnose peripheral artery disease (PAD) and relevant conditions, they differ in terms of methodology, capability, and effectiveness. The comparison below will elucidate why the TM Flow System is better suited for healthcare providers.


Overview

TM Flow System

This advanced diagnostic tool combines various technologies to analyze vascular health and autonomic function, effectively detecting early signs of peripheral artery disease.


Technology Applied

  • It involves a range of technologies, including Sudomotor function tests, Photo-plethysmography analysis, and measurement of the Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI).


Duration of Procedure

  • Around 7-10 minutes.


Key Features

  • Non-invasive, and results are easy to interpret.

  • Comprehensive analysis of autonomic nervous system function and vascular health.

  • Sensitivity of 95.7% for detecting vascular issues.


QuantaFlo Test

A diagnostic tool that measures blood volume changes in peripheral arteries to detect flow obstructions related to peripheral artery disease (PAD), providing quick and seamless results.


Technology Used

  • It uses volume plethysmography to measure blood volume changes in arterial distributions.


Procedure Duration

  • Generally quick but less defined than TM Flow.


Key Features

  • Accuracy of 89.7%, sensitivity of 89.5%, and specificity of 90% for diagnosing PAD.

  • Primarily focused on detecting flow obstruction in peripheral arteries.


Key Comparisons

Feature

TM Flow System

QuantaFlo Test

Testing Duration

7-10 minutes

Quick, but varies

Sensitivity

95.7%

89.5%

Accuracy

High due to a multi-faceted approach

89.7%

Methodology

Combines multiple diagnostic tests

Volume plethysmography

Interpretation of Results

Easy to understand with color-coding

Standard report

Non-Invasiveness

Yes

Yes

When to Use TM Flow System vs QuantaFlo Test

Understanding when to use each test is important for proper patient care:


Use TM Flow System When

  • A more thorough test for vascular health is required, especially if symptoms point out both vascular and neuropathic problems.

  • Early diagnosis of chronic metabolic diseases is highly desired since TM Flow can identify subtle changes in the functioning of the autonomic nervous system.

  • Rapid turnaround time is important for timely intervention as it has an efficient testing procedure.


Use QuantaFlo Test When:

  • The major emphasis is placed on diagnosing PAD in a simple manner without the need for extensive assessment of other health parameters.

  • The testing environment is a primary care setting where quick assessments are needed, and the healthcare provider is familiar with its interpretation.


Which Test is Effective for Early PAD Detection?

The TM Flow Test is more effective and superior to Qunataflo for the following reasons:


A Comprehensive Assessment

The TM Flow System assesses several aspects related to vascular health, including the functions of the autonomic nervous system, making it essential to understand a comprehensive view of any patient's medical condition.


Enhanced Sensitivity & Accuracy

The TM Flow test detects early vascular problems with a sensitivity of 95.7%, compared with QuantaFlo. This is highly important for intervention.

Use-Friendly Experience

The results are available in an interpretable form for the healthcare providers to quickly decide on patient care.


Quick Turn Around

It takes 7-10 minutes to conduct the entire testing, which makes it ideal for a busy clinical setup.


More Advanced Diagnostic

TM Flow is designed to evaluate autonomic nervous system function so it can diagnose even more significant clinical conditions concerning chronic metabolic diseases.


Proven Viability and Applications

TM Flow System has been used in over 1,000 private practice offices, health systems, and hospitals nationwide since its development in 2007. The very high sensitivity level of 95.7% increases the applicability of this diagnostic test.


Conclusion

In conclusion, while both the TM Flow System and QuantaFlo Test serve important roles in diagnosing peripheral artery disease, the TM Flow System stands out as the more advanced diagnostic tool. Its higher sensitivity, comprehensive assessment capabilities, user-friendly reporting, and quick testing duration make it an invaluable asset in modern healthcare settings.


4 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comentarios


bottom of page